2001 Ford Windstar vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2001 Ford Windstar is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Windstar (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Because 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Windstar | 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Windstar | Sigma |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5103 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1946 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1679 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3066 mm | 2520 mm |
