2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod vs. 1959 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod (469 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 407 more horse power than 1959 Jeep CJ5. (62 HP @ 3000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod should accelerate faster than 1959 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod weights approximately 122 kg more than 1959 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Jeep CJ5 (180 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. (178 Nm). This means 1959 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod | 1959 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | XR 8 Xplod | CJ5 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 3153 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 469 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1180 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2060 mm |