2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod vs. 1967 Mini MK I
To start off, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mini MK I would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod (469 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 435 more horse power than 1967 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod should accelerate faster than 1967 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod weights approximately 687 kg more than 1967 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod (178 Nm) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mini MK I. (60 Nm). This means 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod | 1967 Mini MK I | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | XR 8 Xplod | MK I |
Year Released | 2001 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 469 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 60 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 615 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2040 mm |