2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod vs. 1976 Triumph Stag

To start off, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Triumph Stag. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Triumph Stag would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod (469 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 326 more horse power than 1976 Triumph Stag. (143 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod should accelerate faster than 1976 Triumph Stag. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod weights approximately 92 kg more than 1976 Triumph Stag. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1976 Triumph Stag is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Triumph Stag. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Triumph Stag (234 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. (178 Nm). This means 1976 Triumph Stag will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod.

Compare all specifications: