2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod vs. 1986 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod (469 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 410 more horse power than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod should accelerate faster than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod weights approximately 437 kg more than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod (178 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. (96 Nm). This means 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod | 1986 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | XR 8 Xplod | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2001 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 1270 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 469 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 96 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 865 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2420 mm |