2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod vs. 1997 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod (469 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 346 more horse power than 1997 Toyota 4Runner. (123 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod should accelerate faster than 1997 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 548 kg more than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod.
Because 1997 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Toyota 4Runner (295 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. (178 Nm). This means 1997 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod | 1997 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | XR 8 Xplod | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5700 cc | 2980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 469 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 295 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1850 kg |
