2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod (469 HP) has 363 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod weights approximately 327 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod (178 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (145 Nm). This means 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Ford | MCC |
Model | XR 8 Xplod | Smart |
Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 469 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 178 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 975 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 47 L |