2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod vs. 2004 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod (469 HP) has 237 more horse power than 2004 Lincoln LS. (232 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod should accelerate faster than 2004 Lincoln LS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 385 kg more than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod.
Because 2004 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln LS (298 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. (178 Nm). This means 2004 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod | 2004 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Ford | Lincoln |
Model | XR 8 Xplod | LS |
Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 469 HP | 232 HP |
Torque | 178 Nm | 298 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1687 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 68 L |