2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod vs. 2008 Volvo C30
To start off, 2008 Volvo C30 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod (469 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 335 more horse power than 2008 Volvo C30. (134 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod should accelerate faster than 2008 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo C30 weights approximately 119 kg more than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo C30 (320 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. (178 Nm). This means 2008 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod | 2008 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | XR 8 Xplod | C30 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5700 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 469 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1421 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 52 L |
