2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod vs. 2009 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod (469 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 321 more horse power than 2009 Honda CR-V. (148 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod should accelerate faster than 2009 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Honda CR-V weights approximately 166 kg more than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod.
Because 2009 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Honda CR-V (192 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. (178 Nm). This means 2009 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod | 2009 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | XR 8 Xplod | CR-V |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5700 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 469 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1468 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 58 L |
