2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod (469 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 365 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod (178 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 3. (145 Nm). This means 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | XR 8 Xplod | 3 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5700 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 469 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 55 L |
