2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod vs. 2012 Volvo XC90

To start off, 2012 Volvo XC90 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod (469 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 2012 Volvo XC90. (240 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod should accelerate faster than 2012 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 853 kg more than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod.

Because 2012 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. (178 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. 2012 Volvo XC90 has automatic transmission and 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod has manual transmission. 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo XC90 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: