2001 GMC Safari vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 GMC Safari (187 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2012 Honda CR-V. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda CR-V.
Because 2001 GMC Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 GMC Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 GMC Safari. (338 Nm). This means 2012 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 GMC Safari.
Compare all specifications:
2001 GMC Safari | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
Make | GMC | Honda |
Model | Safari | CR-V |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 338 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4554 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1819 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 58 L |