2001 GMC Sierra vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2001 GMC Sierra is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 GMC Sierra (197 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 GMC Sierra weights approximately 580 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 GMC Sierra (352 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2001 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 GMC Sierra | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | GMC | Triumph |
| Model | Sierra | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 352 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2700 mm |
