2001 GMC Sierra vs. 2005 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2005 Mercury Sable is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Sable (201 HP) has 4 more horse power than 2001 GMC Sierra. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 2001 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 GMC Sierra weights approximately 271 kg more than 2005 Mercury Sable.
Because 2001 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mercury Sable. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 GMC Sierra (352 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercury Sable. (281 Nm). This means 2001 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
2001 GMC Sierra | 2005 Mercury Sable | |
Make | GMC | Mercury |
Model | Sierra | Sable |
Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 201 HP |
Torque | 352 Nm | 281 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 1504 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2760 mm |