2001 GMC Sierra vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 GMC Sierra weights approximately 324 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30.
Because 2001 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (400 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 GMC Sierra. (352 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 GMC Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 GMC Sierra | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | GMC | Volvo |
| Model | Sierra | C30 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 352 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2639 mm |
