2001 GMC Terracross vs. 2009 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2009 Mercury Sable is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 GMC Terracross. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 GMC Terracross would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercury Sable weights approximately 29 kg more than 2001 GMC Terracross.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 GMC Terracross | 2009 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | GMC | Mercury |
| Model | Terracross | Sable |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3400 cc | 3494 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 263 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1896 kg | 1925 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2870 mm |
