2001 Holden GTS vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Holden GTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Holden GTS would be higher. At 4,144 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Holden GTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Holden GTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Holden GTS (692 Nm) has 486 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda BT-50. (206 Nm). This means 2001 Holden GTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda BT-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Holden GTS | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | GTS | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4144 cc | 2606 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 692 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
