2001 Holden HSV vs. 1996 Mazda 626
To start off, 2001 Holden HSV is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Holden HSV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Holden HSV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Holden HSV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 547 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 626. (145 Nm). This means 2001 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Holden HSV | 1996 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | HSV | 626 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5698 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 692 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |