2001 Holden HSV vs. 2002 Mazda 6
To start off, 2002 Mazda 6 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Holden HSV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Holden HSV would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Holden HSV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Holden HSV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Holden HSV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 511 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 6. (181 Nm). This means 2001 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Holden HSV | 2002 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | HSV | 6 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5698 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 692 Nm | 181 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
