2001 Holden HSV vs. 2003 Oldsmobile Alero
To start off, 2003 Oldsmobile Alero is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Holden HSV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Holden HSV would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Holden HSV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Holden HSV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Holden HSV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Oldsmobile Alero, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 489 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Oldsmobile Alero. (203 Nm). This means 2001 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Oldsmobile Alero. 2003 Oldsmobile Alero has automatic transmission and 2001 Holden HSV has manual transmission. 2001 Holden HSV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Oldsmobile Alero will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Holden HSV | 2003 Oldsmobile Alero | |
| Make | Holden | Oldsmobile |
| Model | HSV | Alero |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5698 cc | 2196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 139 HP |
| Torque | 692 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
