2001 Holden HSV vs. 2009 Tata Nano
To start off, 2009 Tata Nano is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Holden HSV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Holden HSV would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Holden HSV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 644 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Tata Nano. (48 Nm). This means 2001 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Holden HSV | 2009 Tata Nano | |
Make | Holden | Tata |
Model | HSV | Nano |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5698 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 35 HP |
Torque | 692 Nm | 48 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |