2001 Holden HSV vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Holden HSV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Holden HSV would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Holden HSV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 390 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Cadillac CTS. (302 Nm). This means 2001 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Holden HSV | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Holden | Cadillac |
Model | HSV | CTS |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5698 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
Torque | 692 Nm | 302 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |