2001 Holden HSV vs. 2012 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Holden HSV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Holden HSV would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Holden HSV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Colorado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Holden HSV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Colorado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 434 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Colorado. (258 Nm). This means 2001 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Holden HSV | 2012 Chevrolet Colorado | |
Make | Holden | Chevrolet |
Model | HSV | Colorado |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5698 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 186 HP |
Torque | 692 Nm | 258 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |