2001 Holden Maloo vs. 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2001 Holden Maloo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 5,899 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Holden Maloo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 2001 Holden Maloo has manual transmission. 2001 Holden Maloo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Holden Maloo | 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Holden | Jeep |
| Model | Maloo | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5663 cc | 5899 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 247 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
