2001 Holden Maloo vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Holden Maloo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Holden Maloo would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Holden Maloo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Holden Maloo | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | Maloo | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5663 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 245 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
