2001 Holden Maloo vs. 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Holden Maloo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Holden Maloo would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Holden Maloo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 2001 Holden Maloo has manual transmission. 2001 Holden Maloo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Holden Maloo | 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Holden | Jeep |
| Model | Maloo | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5663 cc | 5654 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 381 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
