2001 Holden Maloo vs. 2010 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2010 Ford Expedition is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Holden Maloo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Holden Maloo would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Ford Expedition has automatic transmission and 2001 Holden Maloo has manual transmission. 2001 Holden Maloo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford Expedition will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Holden Maloo | 2010 Ford Expedition | |
| Make | Holden | Ford |
| Model | Maloo | Expedition |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5663 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 310 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
