2001 Holden Maloo vs. 2012 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2012 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Holden Maloo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Holden Maloo would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Toyota Sequoia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Holden Maloo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Sequoia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Toyota Sequoia has automatic transmission and 2001 Holden Maloo has manual transmission. 2001 Holden Maloo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Toyota Sequoia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Holden Maloo | 2012 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | Maloo | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5663 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 381 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
