2001 Holden UTE vs. 1952 Jaguar C-Type
To start off, 2001 Holden UTE is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar C-Type (218 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2001 Holden UTE. (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar C-Type should accelerate faster than 2001 Holden UTE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Holden UTE weights approximately 485 kg more than 1952 Jaguar C-Type.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar C-Type (330 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Holden UTE. (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar C-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Holden UTE | 1952 Jaguar C-Type | |
Make | Holden | Jaguar |
Model | UTE | C-Type |
Year Released | 2001 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3789 cc | 3442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 218 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2450 mm |