2001 Holden UTE vs. 1954 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2001 Holden UTE is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1954 Talbot T 26. (198 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1954 Talbot T 26. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 110 kg more than 2001 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Holden UTE | 1954 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | Holden | Talbot |
| Model | UTE | T 26 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 3789 cc | 4482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 198 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1890 mm |
