2001 Holden UTE vs. 1963 Zastava 1300

To start off, 2001 Holden UTE is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Holden UTE (204 HP) has 151 more horse power than 1963 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1963 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Holden UTE weights approximately 520 kg more than 1963 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2001 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications: