2001 Holden UTE vs. 1965 Seat 1500
To start off, 2001 Holden UTE is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1965 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1965 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Holden UTE weights approximately 340 kg more than 1965 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Holden UTE | 1965 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Holden | Seat |
Model | UTE | 1500 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3789 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2660 mm |