2001 Holden UTE vs. 1977 Nissan Cedric

To start off, 2001 Holden UTE is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Holden UTE (302 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1977 Nissan Cedric. (74 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1977 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Holden UTE weights approximately 240 kg more than 1977 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Holden UTE (460 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 313 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Nissan Cedric. (147 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2001 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Nissan Cedric.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Holden UTE 1977 Nissan Cedric
Make Holden Nissan
Model UTE Cedric
Year Released 2001 1977
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5665 cc 1981 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 302 HP 74 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 460 Nm 147 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 2800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1590 kg 1350 kg
Vehicle Length 5060 mm 4700 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2700 mm