2001 Holden UTE vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 2001 Holden UTE is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Holden UTE (204 HP) has 151 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Holden UTE weights approximately 850 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Holden UTE | 1997 MCC Smart | |
Make | Holden | MCC |
Model | UTE | Smart |
Year Released | 2001 | 1997 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3789 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 53 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1460 mm |