2001 Holden UTE vs. 2002 Ford F-150
To start off, 2002 Ford F-150 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Holden UTE would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2002 Ford F-150. (202 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford F-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford F-150 weights approximately 575 kg more than 2001 Holden UTE.
Because 2002 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford F-150 (339 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Holden UTE. (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2002 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Holden UTE | 2002 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Holden | Ford |
Model | UTE | F-150 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3789 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 339 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 2075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3050 mm |