2001 Holden UTE vs. 2005 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2005 Mercury Sable is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Holden UTE would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Holden UTE (204 HP) has 51 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Sable. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Sable weights approximately 13 kg more than 2001 Holden UTE.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Holden UTE (305 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercury Sable. (252 Nm). This means 2001 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Holden UTE | 2005 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Holden | Mercury |
| Model | UTE | Sable |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3789 cc | 2983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 252 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1513 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2760 mm |
