2001 Holden Zafira vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Holden Zafira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Holden Zafira would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda CR-V (148 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2001 Holden Zafira. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 2001 Holden Zafira.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Holden Zafira. (203 Nm). This means 2012 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Holden Zafira. 2012 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 2001 Holden Zafira has manual transmission. 2001 Holden Zafira will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Holden Zafira | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Holden | Honda |
Model | Zafira | CR-V |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4554 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1819 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2619 mm |