2001 Honda Civic vs. 1957 Talbot 2500

To start off, 2001 Honda Civic is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Talbot 2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Talbot 2500 would be higher. At 2,490 cc (4 cylinders), 1957 Talbot 2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Honda Civic (127 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1957 Talbot 2500. (118 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1957 Talbot 2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Honda Civic weights approximately 272 kg more than 1957 Talbot 2500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1957 Talbot 2500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Talbot 2500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1957 Talbot 2500 (196 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Honda Civic. (119 Nm @ 5900 RPM). This means 1957 Talbot 2500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Honda Civic.

Compare all specifications: