2001 Honda Civic vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2001 Honda Civic is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,672 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Honda Civic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Honda Civic (118 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Honda Civic weights approximately 225 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Honda Civic | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Honda | Zastava |
| Model | Civic | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 1672 cc | 846 cc |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2010 mm |
