2001 Honda CR-V vs. 1989 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 Honda CR-V is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Honda CR-V (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1989 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1989 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 2001 Honda CR-V has manual transmission. 2001 Honda CR-V will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Honda CR-V | 1989 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Honda | Ford |
| Model | CR-V | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1989 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4690 mm |
