2001 Honda Fit vs. 1942 Jeep MB
To start off, 2001 Honda Fit is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Jeep MB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Jeep MB would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1942 Jeep MB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Honda Fit (85 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1942 Jeep MB. (59 HP @ 3820 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Honda Fit should accelerate faster than 1942 Jeep MB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Jeep MB weights approximately 90 kg more than 2001 Honda Fit.
Because 1942 Jeep MB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Honda Fit. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1942 Jeep MB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1942 Jeep MB (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Honda Fit. (119 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1942 Jeep MB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Honda Fit | 1942 Jeep MB | |
Make | Honda | Jeep |
Model | Fit | MB |
Year Released | 2001 | 1942 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1339 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 3820 RPM |
Torque | 119 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 3330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2040 mm |