2001 Honda Fit vs. 1964 Volvo 220
To start off, 2001 Honda Fit is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,776 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Honda Fit (85 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Honda Fit should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Volvo 220 weights approximately 25 kg more than 2001 Honda Fit.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Volvo 220 (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Honda Fit. (119 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1964 Volvo 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Honda Fit | 1964 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Honda | Volvo |
Model | Fit | 220 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1339 cc | 1776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 119 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 8.7:1 |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 45 L |