2001 Honda Fit vs. 1967 Mini MK I
To start off, 2001 Honda Fit is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,339 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Honda Fit is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Honda Fit (85 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1967 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Honda Fit should accelerate faster than 1967 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Honda Fit weights approximately 375 kg more than 1967 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Honda Fit (119 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2001 Honda Fit will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Honda Fit | 1967 Mini MK I | |
Make | Honda | Mini |
Model | Fit | MK I |
Year Released | 2001 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1339 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 119 Nm | 60 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2040 mm |