2001 Honda Fit vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2001 Honda Fit is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,339 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Honda Fit is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Honda Fit (85 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Honda Fit should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Honda Fit weights approximately 220 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Honda Fit (119 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2001 Honda Fit will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Honda Fit | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Honda | Zastava |
| Model | Fit | 102 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1339 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 119 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2160 mm |
