2001 Honda Fit vs. 1987 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 Honda Fit is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2001 Honda Fit. (85 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2001 Honda Fit.
Because 1987 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Honda Fit. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Honda Fit | 1987 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Honda | Ford |
Model | Fit | Ranger |
Year Released | 2001 | 1987 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1339 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1810 mm |