2001 Honda Fuya Jo vs. 1996 Mazda RX-7

To start off, 2001 Honda Fuya Jo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2001 Honda Fuya Jo. (127 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2001 Honda Fuya Jo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 470 kg more than 2001 Honda Fuya Jo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Honda Fuya Jo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda RX-7 (296 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Honda Fuya Jo. (149 Nm). This means 1996 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Honda Fuya Jo. 2001 Honda Fuya Jo has automatic transmission and 1996 Mazda RX-7 has manual transmission. 1996 Mazda RX-7 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Honda Fuya Jo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: