2001 Hyundai Atos vs. 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser
To start off, 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Hyundai Atos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Hyundai Atos would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser (256 HP) has 202 more horse power than 2001 Hyundai Atos. (54 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2001 Hyundai Atos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser weights approximately 1142 kg more than 2001 Hyundai Atos. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Hyundai Atos. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser (367 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Hyundai Atos. (86 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Hyundai Atos. 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser has automatic transmission and 2001 Hyundai Atos has manual transmission. 2001 Hyundai Atos will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Hyundai Atos | 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser | |
| Make | Hyundai | Toyota |
| Model | Atos | FJ Cruiser |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 999 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 54 HP | 256 HP |
| Torque | 86 Nm | 367 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 95 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 821 kg | 1963 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 5.4 L/100km | 10.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 8 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 72 L |
