2001 Hyundai Matrix vs. 2010 Tata Nano
To start off, 2010 Tata Nano is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Hyundai Matrix. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Hyundai Matrix would be higher. At 1,495 cc (3 cylinders), 2001 Hyundai Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Hyundai Matrix (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2010 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Hyundai Matrix should accelerate faster than 2010 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Hyundai Matrix weights approximately 690 kg more than 2010 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Hyundai Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Hyundai Matrix (183 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2001 Hyundai Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Hyundai Matrix | 2010 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Hyundai | Tata |
| Model | Matrix | Nano |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1495 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 48 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.1 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 37 L |
