2001 Jaguar X-Type vs. 1963 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2001 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2001 Jaguar X-Type. (194 HP @ 6800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2001 Jaguar X-Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 840 kg more than 2001 Jaguar X-Type. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Jaguar X-Type is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jaguar X-Type will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Jaguar X-Type | 1963 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Jaguar | Lincoln |
| Model | X-Type | Continental |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2495 cc | 7048 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 194 HP | 284 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 2400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 5500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2000 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3210 mm |
